Rocco Sticks review
A middling treat food - fine, with clear compromises. 40% declared meat content is respectable, and the label keeps too much vague. The breakdown below shows exactly where every point went.
Label last checked
Spotted something wrong? Tell us
Write a reviewWhere the points went
The full breakdown, exactly as the algorithm scored it. How our rating works
Our analysis
Breaking the 55 down: the biggest single loss is label transparency, where it takes 2 of a possible 15. Its strongest showing is additives at 10 of 10. On top of that, 10 points are deducted outright for red-flag ingredients - a penalty applied before anything else is counted, which is why the total lands where it does.
The label declares 40% meat, which is a real number, which already puts it ahead of the many that print none, and the ingredient list leans on vague groupings instead of naming what is actually in the bag.
Ingredients
Straight from the label, grouped by role - every ingredient is coloured by our published classification and links to its full page.
Meat & fish
Fruit & veg
Supplements & extras
Nutrition
Declared analysis converted to a dry-matter basis, so wet and dry foods compare fairly.
Protein
Fat
Est. carbs
Fibre
Ash
Carbohydrates are estimated: 100% minus protein, fat, fibre, ash and moisture.
Similar foods that score higher
Same type and life stage, better ODF Score, comparable price per day.
More from Rocco Diet Care
Other foods in this range, whatever they score - the full picture, not just the top of the list.
Write a review of Rocco Sticks
Related guides
This is label analysis, not veterinary advice - if your dog has a health condition, talk to your vet before switching foods.